In an age of the rising influence of various animal rights movements, the ever-growing trade in exotic pets is an obvious culprit and regularly finds itself under the microscope. The reason why the debate over keeping exotic pets has rumbled on for so long is that there is no simple answer. There are equally sound arguments on both sides of the debate, and a conclusion is hard to reach. One of the main problems in settling the debate over keeping exotic pets is the variable definition of ’exotic pets’. By the strict definition, even non-native animals that are bred locally and legally, and not taken from their natural environment, are ’exotic’. Similarly, while the term ’exotic animals’ usually sets alarm bells ringing, not all exotic animals are a threat to society. Pythons and chimpanzees, primarily, are the culprits in pet attacks, and such animals are obviously dangerous, but the extremely harmless and positively cute sugar gliders and crested geckos are not even dangerous for infants, let alone adult, sensible pet owners.
Animal rights activist, Martin Scott, said ""Most exotic pets are low-maintenance ― at least in comparison to dogs and cats. Lizards, frogs, spiders, and even snakes require basic and cheap shelters, cheap food, and minimal veterinary care. An empty aquarium with a bit of bedding and a few rocks will do just fine. Some species may need some branches and live plants. So, they are perfect for the typical urban pet owner, who can easily house these animals in an average apartment. On the flip side, though, these pets won’t be as affectionate as dogs. They will recognize you and tolerate your handling, and a few may go so far as seeking out your attention.""
Marla Pennington, professor of economics, University of British Columbia, supported the cause of rearing exotic animals. She said it is a tragedy that people think of a tiger or a cougar when they think of ’exotic animals’. She added, ""If we take the dangerous wild animals out of the equation, how many deaths do you think pet lizards, frogs, snakes (including the scarily named boa constrictor and the much-maligned African rock python), spiders (including poisonous spiders) guinea pigs, wild cats, wallabies, etc., have caused? In Canada, at least, the total is much less than the number of fatal attacks by dogs! That’s right; your neighbour’s Doberman Pinscher is likelier to come at you than your creepy neighbour’s boa constrictor.""
Jamie Lawson, a budding entrepreneur from Ottawa, condemned the idea. He explained, ""Though this is rare, exotic animals may act as vectors to diseases that can start an epidemic in their introduced locality. Thanks to the inability of many pathogens to cross species barriers, this problem has a natural, but partial remedy. However, diseases such as hepatitis A and B, rabies, and salmonella are some commonly observable diseases that can be transmitted by exotic reptiles and mammals.""
Zoology student, Zhang Li, Edmonton University, condemned those who favoured keeping exotic animals as pets. She said that the wild populations of some exotic pets are severely affected by the pet trade. Due to this, bans have been imposed on the trade of numerous animals, but the illegal pet trade continues to fester in many wildlife-rich regions of the world. Animals such as big cats (none of which is in rude health at the moment) and many primates need all the help we can provide for their wild populations to flourish. The illegal pet trade is a big contributor to the reducing numbers of some species.